Saturday, February 23, 2013
Realised that I left for my New Zealand trip a year ago today. Oh how time flies. And not much changes. Again I'm on the road, having driven to Newcastle Airport for a Brisbane getaway. Excitement!
Anyway, your reviews for the week. Enjoy :)
***
AL Pacino’s involvement in the film adaptation of a real-life robbery was slow to emerge after his exhaustion from The Godfather: Part II made him initially decline the role of Sonny Wortzik. But on finally accepting, Sidney Lumet had his man and went about bringing the story of John Wojtowicz to life.
MISSED LAST WEEK'S REVIEW? See what I thought of Safe Haven.
Saturday, July 07, 2012
Your bonus this week is Al Pacino cop classic Serpico (1973). A New York love affair in the week of Independence Day for the stars and stripes...
The Amazing Spider-Man 3D (M)
WHEN the news came out in 2010 that Sam Raimi had decided not to continue with the Spider-Man franchise after his third venture was released in 2007, it was thought to have spelt doom. Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst had long said if Raimi was out, so were they, and they stayed true to their word. But Sony Pictures had other ideas, taking Raimi’s idea of developing the alter ego of scientist Dr Curt Connors, and rebooting the story to when Peter Parker was first exposed to the super spiders.
Their major focus would seem to be taking it back to essentially forget the trilogy that made up the bulk of Marvel’s top-grossing films. Peter (Andrew Garfield) is a nerdy teenager in love with Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone), living with Uncle Ben (Martin Sheen) and Aunt May (Sally Field) after his parents mysteriously left them in his care as a kid. From there it changes as Peter finds himself looking for answers to his father’s past, finding Dr Connors (Rhys Ifans) and the theories of cross-species genetics. Enter spider bite.
There’s a lot to like with the new elements of the story, particularly seeing more of Peter as a teenager. If only in that respect, it feels like a prequel as he bumbles through his days, unsure of himself when talking to Gwen or trying to stand up to Flash Thompson (Chris Zylka). His hunger to discover why his father was so secretive leads him to a hidden formula that could unlock the key to genetic regrowth. Now that’s heavy stuff for a senior.
But Peter Parker’s life has always been that - constant heaviness on his shoulders as he burdens the guilt of Uncle Ben’s death as well as the responsibility he’s been given with his newfound abilities. This time around it’s Gwen he confides in, and their relationship, although awkward at first like that of many teenagers, grows within the story’s short timespan.
The Lizard, Dr Connors’ alter ego, is a creature just as hurt as any other lost, desperate soul. He’s not really evil, he just believes in creating a perfect world. But the mutation gets the better of him and it all falls on Spidey to fix what he contributed to breaking. It’s all a bit unfortunate really, and there’s never a definitive answer for Peter on where his parents went.
As the first Spider-Man film in 3D, the effect serves it well, director Marc Webb (500 Days of Summer) making sure Peter’s sticky stuff is particularly shown off to effect. Garfield, with expectation burdening on his own shoulders, plays Peter/Spider-Man as naïve as he should be, a teenager coming to grips with what’s out in the big bad world. Even Maguire purists should appreciate his interpretation; Garfield’s more youthful looks are a benefit to this story of Spider-Man’s origin.
Stone is a Gwen just as unsure about life and boys as any other teenage girl, and works well with Garfield and Denis Leary, her stern father Captain Stacy. With a big A-list cast, it all falls together nicely. It’s only the story itself that will unsettle most previous fans.
James Vanderbilt’s story would be more than agreeable had there not already been a film that already addresses half this story’s content. The concept of this reboot is more confusing than anything else because this film won’t stand as a straight prequel - but the idea of starting a new franchise and dismissing three of Marvel’s best productions is incomprehensible to the majority of moviegoers. Although some of the 136 minutes are stretched out, there’s no doubt the film works as a stand-alone. But where this new franchise leads when some of the hero’s biggest nemeses have already been explored is uncertain.
Rating: 4/5
*Published in the Daily Liberal (Dubbo), Western Advocate (Bathurst), Parkes Champion Post and Midstate Observer (Orange) from Saturday 7/6/2012
***
Serpico (1973)
Sidney Lumet directed
Al Pacino twice before his death in 2011, the first of those Serpico, a true story about an honest
cop who couldn’t stand to see the corruption in the New York Police Force
continue. The film came out after Pacino had made his name in The Godfather and the streets of New
York were becoming a big Hollywood focus.
*Published in the Mailbox Shopper (Dubbo) from Wednesday 4/7/2012
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
One thing I promised I would do when moving to Dubbo was make more time to relax and do things I wouldn't normally give myself time to do. Like lazing around for an entire day. Safe to say I don't feel AS bad about doing that now...
Also gives me a chance to start seeing some of the films on my 'I need to really get onto that' list.
So this week I rented The Godfather and Animal Kingdom. Finally, I know.
Watching The Godfather made me draw immediate comparisons to Luchino Visconti's epic Il Gattopardo (The Leopard). Now, I know some of my readers will have never heard of that film - basically the Cannes winner is perhaps one of Italy's most significant films, a three-hour-plus epic about Sicilian nobles in the aftermath of the Risorgimento movement in the 1860.
That film is amazing and Coppola no doubt drew from Visconti's grandeur, particularly in the scenes where Michael (Al Pacino) hides out in Italy. Stunning.
As good as The Godfather is (and I do understand why a lot of the world loves it so much, it's crafted very well), half the time my mind wandered because I just couldn't help but marvel at how good-looking Pacino was in his early years. Don't judge me! But he really was good in this film. They all were.
Animal Kingdom also deserved every accolade it got. That film was frickin' intense. Gutsy, gritty and just magnificent. Go Australian cinema!
I was on the edge of my seat for a large part of this, not knowing where it was heading and enjoying the freaky ride. Ben Mendelsohn was incredibly creepy, but all were brilliant. Wondered exactly how the Academy considered Jacki Weaver's role to be so special for a nomination - then with what, 20 minutes of the film to go, I got it. What a star turn. Wow.
Two 'about time' films off the list, one a classic and the other with potential to be so, at least within Australian cinema history. Good to have made progress in this department.