Showing posts with label Anthony Hopkins. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anthony Hopkins. Show all posts
Saturday, August 31, 2013
RED 2 (MA 15+)
RED was something of a mild success, a comic book adaptation without the fanfare but with the oddest bunch of oldie agents around. While not in the same category as other DC or Marvel comic fare, a high-calibre cast gave it the gravitas it needed to stand in its own field.
As to be expected in the life of a former CIA agent though, trouble finds them when they are implicated to have knowledge of the location of a bomb created as part of Operation Nightshade.
Like other action sequels (think Taken 2), the story expands to allow international locations and the introduction of what are meant to be more exotic characters. Katja (Catherine Zeta-Jones) is a Russian agent revealed to be Frank's Kryptonite, while David Thewlis plays a man simply known as The Frog.
Anthony Hopkins is Dr Bailey, the English scientist key to the gang's mission. While he appears less strung up in his role than Zeta-Jones or Thewlis, the lunacy his character exudes is ultimately representative of the film as a whole.
 |
| Photo: clotureclub.com |
Added nods to the original (comic) material through animated segues clash with the overall style of the film. RED never had the feel of a comic adaptation, and this story doesn't either; for agents that don't hold superhero powers, they don't need to. This story continues with plenty of action, blending traditional blow-ups Willis-style with the Asian martial arts skills Han (Byung Hun Lee) unleashes on his opponents.
The script by returning writers Jon and Erich Hoeber fails to create genuine comedy, instead producing a lot of simple stupidity and gags for laughs to a shallow few. It draws on the previous relationships but lacks inspiration to develop them into anything worthwhile. Even the music is unsettling, switching from Linkin Park to Eastern spy themes and managing to add nothing but unwanted tension.
Parisot has created a pot of boiling madness, and if anyone escapes with minimal injuries it's John Malkovich as fellow agent Marvin, and Hopkins. For the rest, it should be straight to the loony bin - but the announcement of a third film means the madness is far from over.
Rating: 2/5
*Published in the Daily Liberal (Dubbo), Western Advocate (Bathurst), Parkes Champion Post and Midstate Observer (Orange) and Rotten Tomatoes from Saturday 31/8/2013
MISSED LAST WEEK'S REVIEW? See what I thought of Kick-Ass 2.
Saturday, January 12, 2013
Hitchcock (M)
AS anyone in the film industry could tell you, when films
are made about someone’s personal story on any level is when they are truly
revered by peers and fans alike. That, or there’s some morbid curiosity the
public has with them. For Englishman Alfred Hitchcock it’s a mix of both, as
the man known for his difficult nature and unrelenting persistence remains the
master of suspense to this very day.
What many didn’t know for a long time was the extent of influence
from the great director’s wife on his features. Alfred Hitchcock (Anthony
Hopkins) and Alma Reville (Helen Mirren) were a duo connected by a great love
of intelligence, direction and a good story. When he looked for a project she
would bring up suggestions, and when he went against the grain of everyone
banking on the success of his work she was right by his side.
Psycho was the
risk of Hitchcock’s career. His desire to adapt a book so violent horrified
Paramount Pictures, but his standing in the industry made for worthy persuasion.
What became most important to him during the process is rightfully highlighted
as the most intriguing element and would arguably become cinema’s greatest
scene.
Finding Janet Leigh (Scarlett Johansson) was a triumph, but
to Alma it was something of a case she couldn’t win; another Hitchcock blonde
she saw her husband lust after. But what audiences wouldn’t know is that Alma
had her own episode of potential adultery with friend and former colleague
Whitfield Cook (Danny Huston). It is these circumstances that threw Hitchcock
into a state beyond any previous form of frustration professionally and
personally.
John J McLaughlin’s screenplay, based on Stephen Rebello book Alfred Hitchcock and the Making of 'Psycho', plays out like a Hitchcock film by pushing the boundaries. Gervasi goes with an unconventional use of breaking the fourth wall at the film’s bookends to not question the gravitas of the legend and the man, but to acknowledge he was in fact achingly real.
Scenes showing Hitchcock observing and interacting with
criminal Ed Gein, on which Psycho was
based, suggests the director himself wasn’t
so sure of his own reality. His imagination would take him to a troubled place
as he immersed himself onto the project; a self-financed one at that. It was
more than just his reputation that could fall.
Director Sacha Gervasi’s first feature film comes four years
after brilliant 2008 music documentary Anvil:
The Story of Anvil. He films Hopkins and Mirren with ease although the two
are strained in their relationship as hidden secrets are kept from one another.
With a cast also including Jessica Biel and Toni Collette,
there is another reflection of Hitchcock’s desire for the best and nothing
less. But the focus on the film shoot
remains largely in the shadow of the personal story at hand, which for fans of
Hitchcock’s work will come as a slight disappointment.
Hitchcock was a man not only driven by work, but also by
love and rediscovering what that meant during Psycho. The morbid fascination Hollywood still has with this man
continues with good reason – in life and death he kept us guessing.
Rating: 3/5
*Published in the Daily Liberal (Dubbo), Western Advocate (Bathurst), Parkes Champion Post and Midstate Observer (Orange) from Saturday 12/1/2013
***
***
Diner (1982)
PROGRESSION from young adulthood to the kind with real responsibility (you know, marriage and babies) is a fact of life, but not all see it that way. Many choose to stay in their own worlds, staunchly of the opinion married life means all hope is gone for a youthful existence.
That idea scares the hell out of six guys in 1959 that reunite in Baltimore for a New Year’s Eve wedding. Eddie (Steve Guttenberg) is unsure of his coming nuptials, but can’t really seek advice from Shrevie (Daniel Stern) - the only one married so far. Shrevie has his own problems with wife Beth (Ellen Barkin), something to come to the attention of gambler student Boogie (Mickey Rourke). Then there’s funnyman Modell (Paul Reiser), likely alcoholic Fenwick (Kevin Bacon) and confused Billy (Timothy Daly).
As the film that launched many of the cast’s careers, its wisecracks are the backbone of the film. They play out through a series of vignettes, disjointed so as to chronicle only the important elements of the week they spend together. The diner at the centre is critical to their wellbeing where they can speak freely and attempt to stay within their bubble.
Eddie’s fiancé is a notable absentee from the story, but for Barry Levinson it works to leave the focus solely on the guys. That makes for some immaturity from them as they get up to laughable antics, but also for memorable comedy in this nostalgic look at the turn of a decade.
*Published in the Mailbox Shopper (Dubbo) on Wednesday 9/1/2013.
MISSED LAST WEEK'S REVIEW? See what I thought of Jack Reacher.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
